The Bottom Line: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
July 19th, 2009 Posted in The Bottom Line | No Comments »
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Brewster’s Millions dvd
Directed by David Yates
I have never seen any of the previous Harry Potter films. I have also not read any of J.K. Rowling’s novels on which the films are based. No, I don’t live under a rock. I know what a Muggle is, the purpose of a sorting hat, and I can name he-who-must-not-be-named. I figured the books and their subsequent films were just kids stuff. I am willing to admit that I was wrong.
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
begins as Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) and best pals Hermione (Emma Watson) and Ron (Rupert Grint) start their sixth year at Hogwart’s School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Harry continues his training with headmaster/mentor Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) to, ultimately, fight his nemesis Voldemort. He is able to see how Voldemort became the evil wizard he is by examining the memories of Tom Riddle, Voldemort’s childhood name. He also comes across a book inscribed by the “Half-Blood Prince,” which leads him on a journey to discover who the book’s owner is. In addition to Harry’s wizardly escapades, there is romance, with Ron and Hermione and Harry and Ginny, Ron’s sister.
A large portion of the film’s audience is built in, with fans of books sure to be first in line. However, anyone with an appreciation of good film-making will enjoy it. In the opening minutes director David Yates takes us on a long, seemingly single-take ride through the streets of London. It’s an extraordinary shot that literally took my breath away. The entire film is beautiful to look at, while avoiding many of the gimmicks that might otherwise make the many flashbacks look cheesy. Yates owes a lot to the stellar work of cinematographer Bruno Delbonnel and production designer Stuart Craig, who craft a distinct but very real world.
To talk about the acting in a Harry Potter film may be missing the point. The young actors all perform admirably but, much more notably, they actually look like teenagers. This a rarity in an industry where anyone under 35 can play a high schooler. The rest of the cast reads like a Who’s Who of British acting royalty, with Jim Broadbent seemingly having the time of his life as Professor Slughorn, the new potions professor. Also, Helena Bonham Carter steals each of her scenes as Voldemort’s most loyal Death Eater.
Steve Kloves, who has adapted all of the novels for the big screen, manages to make 153 minutes feel like not long enough. Kloves’ script also provides just the right amount of exposition. There is enough information so that Potter virgins, like yours truly, aren’t lost – but diehard fans won’t be bored. The script also possesses a distinctly British sensibility, despite the worldwide fame of the books. For example, Harry is referred to as a “tosser,” and anything exciting is met with a chorus of “brilliant.” The cavalcade of actors with Sir or Dame before their name is only the icing on the incredibly English crumpet.
I liked Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, but saying that alone sells short its charms. I had fun seeing this film and fun has been in short supply at the multiplex this summer. I also fully expect to see the film clean up in the technical categories come Oscar time.
The Bottom Line: Grab the kids and go! This is a film that needs to be experienced in a theater. I promise you won’t be bored, and you’ll leave counting the days until the release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (it’s 491, as of this writing.)
–Sarah Hudson








Jane Mayer