New Republic: Last Rites for Journalism?
March 6th, 2009 Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Showdown in Little Tokyo dvd The New Republic has a quartet of articles on what may be the death knell of print newspapers and journalism as we know it. A page 1 editorial blames a coarsening national attitude towards the press for accelerating the decline:
Just as the press has been slammed by the tides of technology, it has been hit hard by the political culture. The master narratives of both the right and left have come to include the same villan: the hypocritical biased elite media. And their combined grouching has helped foment the anti-media backlash.
Elsewhere, Joe Mathews laments the decline of investigative journalism in his old paper, the Los Angeles Times:
You can count up the journalists who have left the profession and are out of work, but much of the carnage of the ongoing media industry can’t be measured or seen: corruption undiscovered, events not witnessed, tips about problems that never reach anyone’s ears because those ears have left the newsroom…Today’s Times carries plenty of fine news stories…But there are few stories that show deep digging, that took more than a few days to put together.
This new paradigm, the shearing off of investigative reporters and editorial staff, may be glimpsed in microcosm in Gabriel Sherman’s piece on Politico
, the upstart website that got several of last year’s biggest scoops:
Black Cloud ipod Dadnapped film [Politico CEO Robert] Allbritton is dismissive of one of the things print papers did well – long-term, long form investigative journalism – and tells me Politico is unlikely to field an investigative reporting squad. I think we have to acknowledge that the money is spent for reputational benefits and a public service play,” he says of the Times
’ and the Post’s investment in enterprise journalism. “Why does someone have to go off and write their thesis paper while they do it?”
Finally, and most depressingly, Paul Starr turns in a huge essay Closing the Ring hd on the death of the newspapers, and what he sees as the coming era of corruption. The problems are manifold:
[Warren] Buffett’s law of the newspaper jungle, the “survival of the fattest,” favored a broad conceptin of the purview of the newspaper, attentive to a wide variety of human interests. Now the incentives are working in the opposite direction, pushing newspapers toward a more constricted view of their role…
The predominant response in the industry to rising financial pressures has been to concentrate editorial resources close to home…the number of American newspaper correspondents abroad dropped 30 percent between 2002 and 2006…it cannot be a good thing that at a time when America’s economic and security interests are so entangled with the rest of the world, America’s news media are withdrawing from it.
So far the internet hasn’t generated the revenue to make up for the discrepancy abroad, or locally, where government at the federal, state and local level has seen a decline in assigned reporters across the country. For some background on the internet era turn to Greg Waldmann’s review of Andrew Keen’s sloppy The Cult of the Amateur, from our September 2007 issue. Then read our latest issue, where we continue our efforts to attend “to a wide variety of human interests.”


Jane Mayer





